Dear Editor,
The construction of the 6th Street Bridge has moved too far along the approval process to justify cancellation at this stage. The principle of sunk costs must be recognized 鈥� abandoning the project now would mean wasting the investments already made rather than maximizing their utility.
History has shown that poorly timed cancellations in large-scale infrastructure and procurement efforts can lead to long-term financial inefficiencies. The Sea King replacement debacle serves as a cautionary tale (in 1983, the Canadian government started a process to replace the military's then 20-year-old helicopter. The process was finally complete in 2004, with delivery of the new aircraft in 2015). Initial cost-cutting measures resulted in a delayed and more expensive solution, burdening taxpayers in the long run. Similarly, halting the 6th Street Bridge project at this stage would squander substantial resources 鈥� funds that have already been spent on planning, approvals, and early construction efforts.
Beyond financial reasoning, as traffic congestion continues to rise, we must look at sustainable commuting options like cycling and scooter lanes to enhance mobility, safety, and the reduction of emissions. This bridge could be a key piece in developing a forward-thinking transportation network that prioritizes these alternatives. If we cancel now, we lose the chance to optimize infrastructure for cleaner, more efficient urban movement.
This community has the opportunity to lead by example in sustainable commuting and smart infrastructure development. Instead of retreating, we should push forward, ensuring that investments already made serve their intended purpose and contribute to a better, greener future.
Sincerely,
Earl Jovanowski
Courtenay
